Showing posts with label Violence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Violence. Show all posts

Sunday, May 29, 2022

Sermon: Thoughts and Prayers


Lectionary: Year C, Easter 7
Texts: Revelation 22:12-14, 16-17, 20-21; John 17:20-26

“The moral arc of the universe bends toward justice – but only if someone helps bend it.” [1] – Stacey M. Floyd-Thomas

This past week was the kind of week that causes even the most faithful Christian to pause and wonder, even if only in their minds, if God exists, and if God does, does God care about us?

The week opened with a report in which it was confirmed that the largest Christian denomination in the United States[2] has for decades dismissed and covered up child sexual abuse, sexual assault, and rape within not only the churches in its denomination, but among several of its past and present denominational leaders.[3] An article headline at The Atlantic read, “No Atheist Has Done This Much Damage to the Christian Faith.”[4] In a paragraph midway thorough the article, Peter Wehner, the columnist wrote,

“It’s nearly impossible to overstate how much damage these new revelations—these necessary and long-overdue revelations—are doing to the Christian witness. No atheist, no secularists or materialists, could inflict nearly as much damage to the Christian faith as these leaders within the Christian Church have done.”

This is yet another in a repeated pattern among too many churches and denominations. Institutions and their leaders seem to always prioritize their own survival and longevity over caring for the people. Those who dare accuse them are dismissed, shamed, denounced, and called liars, furthering the abuse that the victims have suffered. I’ve personally seen this in churches and church schools I’ve been a part of in my past.

Before the ink was dry on this and many other articles and commentaries that had been written on this topic, they were pushed off the pages by a massacre in Uvalde, Texas where 19 children and 2 teachers were killed by a gunman.

In its aftermath plenty of “thoughts and prayers” were offered to the victims, their families, and the community. Yet if the past is any indication of the present, many offering such “thoughts and prayers” will do nothing towards implementing measures that could reduce the occurrence of these horrific killings that seem to be so regularly occurring that only a few rise to national consciousness.

Here are just a few gun violence tragedies that took place in just the past four to five weeks:[5]

  • May 24: Uvalde, Texas – 19 children and two teachers killed at an elementary school
  • May 14: Buffalo – 10 people killed and 3 wounded in a supermarket
  • May 15: Laguna Woods, California – 1 person killed and 4 critically wounded at Irvine Taiwanese Presbyterian Church
  • May 15: Houston – 2 killed and 3 critically wounded at an open-air flea market
  • May 13: Milwaukee – 16 wounded in downtown Milwaukee
  • April 27: Biloxi, Miss. – 4 killed at a motel and another killed during a connected carjacking

If this were truly a “Christian nation”, as some Christians (erroneously) claim, would we be seeing any of this? Do the value claims of so-called pro-life Christians extend to children in schools and churches? While emphasizing liberty and freedom, how come the emphasis seems mostly to be on that which is associated with power and violence, rather than securing liberty and freedom through safety and care of the young, the weak, the vulnerable, and the marginalized?

I am angry. But I also feel helpless. And even hopeless. The church and Christians have failed and continue to fail so many times, that during times like this week, I even question the value of the church and the faith on which it supposedly rests. I’ve never seen so many pastors and Christian leaders drop the f-bomb and other 4-letter words this week. We are exhausted. We are numb. It feels like all the visible powers are stacked against justice, goodness, care, compassion, and love.

Speaking of swear words and such profanity, it should be noted that their use is not inherently a violation of the third commandment (“don’t take God’s name in vain”), although during my childhood and youth I got the idea that it was. I supposed it was related to some swear phrases using “god” but somehow the third commandment was broadened to include any profanity.

But the third commandment and its violation does have relevance to the present issue. Both Jewish and Christian sources offer us examples of what violations of the third commandment look like.

In Judaism, reciting a blessing from God and then failing to follow through may be considered a transgression of the third commandment. The most common example given is offering a blessing over food but then not partaking of it.[6]

The Epistle of James includes several examples in chapter 2 where a person claims the faith of Christ yet their actions show that their use of the name of Christ is in vain:

My brothers and sisters, do not claim the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ of glory while showing partiality. For if a person with gold rings and in fine clothes comes into your assembly, and if a poor person in dirty clothes also comes in, and if you take notice of the one wearing the fine clothes and say, “Have a seat here in a good place, please,” while to the one who is poor you say, “Stand there,” or, “Sit by my footstool,” have you not made distinctions among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts…? But you have dishonored the poor person…

15 If a brother or sister is naked and lacks daily food 16 and one of you says to them, “Go in peace; keep warm and eat your fill,” and yet you do not supply their bodily needs, what is the good of that? (James 2:1-4, 6a, 15-16)

Jesus himself taught that there would be those who use his name in vain:

21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven. 22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ 23 Then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; go away from me, you who behave lawlessly.’ (Matthew 7:21-23)

To transgress the third commandment then, has little or nothing to do with profanity but about: 1) offering a prayer or petition to God without corresponding action that demonstrates that the person praying is doing their part to fulfill the prayer or petition; and 2) claiming to be a follower of Jesus while taking actions that are incongruent to his life and teachings.

“Thoughts and prayers” that are offered for victims of abuse and victims of violence – for the most part I take them to be well-intentioned. Some may be just platitudes, but I imagine most are sincere expressions. But without corresponding action to follow through, they become meaningless words at best, and at worst, hypocrisy and even sin.

Does this mean we shouldn’t pray for victims, their families, communities, and the nation? If prayer is offered as a performative act or to quiet guilty consciences, perhaps it would be better to not pray at all. But there is a purpose for prayer, and our gospel reading from John offers a way forward.

In Jesus’ prayer recorded in John chapter 17, he prays that God will glorify him just as he glorified God during his years of ministry among the people. Jesus then prays for his disciples to be unified and be one. Jesus has given his disciples God’s word and has sent them into the world. But the world hates the disciples just as the world hates Jesus, because of the word and truth that they now proclaim. The glory that God has given Jesus, Jesus gives to his disciples and all who come to faith because of the word of God proclaimed by the disciples. And it is this glory that is the foundation of unity.

We usually associate power and might with ‘glory’, and we conjure images of Christ as a conquering king to destroy evil and establish a new kingdom of righteousness. And in other writings found in the New Testament, that may sometimes be the case.

But not in the gospel of John. For the gospel writer, the glory of Jesus is the cross and his crucifixion. It is not the kind of might or power that the world expects. Jesus’ glory is intimately related to sacrificial love. And by extension, through Jesus’ prayer, the glory of Christians is not about how powerful and influential we can be in the world, but how much sacrificial love we can have for the world.

What did sacrificial love look like in Jesus’ life? Jesus respected women. He paid attention to children. He cared for grieving widows. He took notice of the poor. He did not ignore or dismiss people with disabilities and disease. He fully accepted those of differing nationalities and race. On the other hand, he was critical of those who showed favoritism and those who marginalized, oppressed, and abused groups that were considered “less.” He was not afraid to publicly shame those who thought they were honorable and defend and lift those who society saw was dishonorable.

By violating cultural expectations and norms, by challenging the status quo, Jesus’ actions threatened the gatekeepers of power. In their honor-based society, the very basis of their position and security was challenged by Jesus. Jesus dared to expose the rot in the system and of those who supported the status quo. For them to retain their honor, Jesus would have to go. If he would not go quietly away, he would have to forcibly be removed. And that led to Jesus’ crucifixion – a death so shameful, his entire movement would be destroyed – or so they thought.

Yet it was this dishonor and shame that was the ultimate demonstration of the extent and depth of God and Jesus’ love for all people and all creation. Jesus does what he must do to play his part in answering his own prayer. The readers of Jesus’ prayer in John 17 must look to Jesus’ example to see what it means to share in his glory and be one with one another. Jesus’ prayer is not calling on God to act and then simply waiting for something to happen. Jesus’ prayer is a call to action for himself and for all of his disciples from his very first ones to all that would follow in turn.

Prayer always includes a call to action. Even the Lord’s Prayer, recited weekly, is a call to action for those who pray it. How can we help hallow God’s name? How can we bring the kingdom to earth today? How can we carry out God’s will today? How can we provide for one another’s daily needs? For what do we need to ask forgiveness from someone? How can we remain strong in the face of temptation to succumb to evil?

Do our actions even matter anymore? Hopelessness and nihilism are common refrains during the last several days.[7] Evil and violence keep repeating, and nothing changes. Attempts to make any change are blocked at every turn, or so it seems. The last thing the gatekeepers of power want is change. They benefit from things the way there are. They do not want change.[8]

Yet we are told and know that Jesus will bring about a restoration of righteousness and justice. Our reading from Revelation is one of those texts.

12 “See, I am coming soon; my reward is with me, to repay according to everyone’s work. 13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.”

14 Blessed are those who wash their robes, so that they will have the right to the tree of life and may enter the city by the gates. (Rev. 22:12-14)

The lection omitted verse 15, but it too, can be a light of hope.

15 Outside are the dogs and sorcerers and sexually immoral and murderers and idolaters and everyone who loves and practices falsehood. (Rev. 22:15)

One way of interpreting this is to see this as all in the future. We will simply have to wait patiently through the present sufferings until Jesus returns to restore everything. But I discussed in last Sunday’s sermon how the New Jerusalem and the new age was already being inaugurated and coming into the present. Today’s text is a continuation of that. Jesus is already coming and the new age is something that we have been tasked to help bring about.

The text calls Christians to action. We are to wash our robes. A commentary on this text observes,

“It is an odd directive. It points us away from sky gazing and orients us toward the everyday work of the faithful, in ways that can be interpreted both practically and metaphorically. Doing laundry is not glamorous or exciting. It can be mundane and tedious labor. Yet it is necessary…

The instructions for those who are waiting are to concentrate on the tasks at hand and to be about the work of cleansing a world made unclean.”[9]

When Jesus prayed for his disciples to share in his glory, he meant for them to do exactly the type of work that he had done. He cared for and loved those whom society ignored and oppressed. In doing so he exposed the rot and evil that was part of the system of power and culture. He exposed the hypocrisy of those who maintained the system and who benefited from it. His direct disciples continued his work, and every subsequent generation of disciples is also called upon to continue this work of exposing the rot of power-based structures and in its place seek to bring about a system based on mutual and self-sacrificing love. Power always separates and divides the haves from the have-nots. Love and sacrifice is the only path to unity, the oneness that Jesus prayed for his disciples to have.

We, as Jesus’ disciples in the 21st century, have been given the same task. Yes, pray and think. But we must also act. We must continue to launder the dirt, the filth, the rot that continues in the world. We must have the courage to be hated for exposing systems and structures that harm and divide. We must fight against the inertia of maintaining the status quo.

We must actively work against violence and work for peace. We must actively confront abusers and empower victims and survivors. We must prioritize people over systems, unjust laws, and unjust applications of laws.[10] We must have the courage to be hated for our stand against injustice, abuse, and violence.

“Thoughts and prayers” are only worthwhile if they are transformed into action to change the world for the better. “Thoughts and prayers” must lead to “laundry day”.

It can be difficult so see the kingdom of God, the New Jerusalem, the glorified Church within and among us. I pray that we will be given the eyes of faith to see reality beyond this physical reality, to see that God is even now working with and through us. And may we be given hope that can overcome the hopelessness that can so easily suffocate us and keep us from action.

The message of Easter is that Christ has overcome death, the grave, and hopelessness. Jesus’ resurrection is the vindication that sacrifice and love will overcome evil and hate. But only if we ourselves are willing to die to the ethics of the world. We must be resurrected into the new life of love and sacrifice found in Christ. May our hope remain strong in Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior.



[1] The Altars Where We Worship (trippfuller.com) (https://trippfuller.com/2022/05/20/the-altars-where-we-worship/)

[2] Largest Christian Denominations in America: The Top 100 – Christianity FAQ (https://christianityfaq.com/largest-christian-denominations-america/)

[3] Guidepost Solutions’ Report of the Independent Investigation — Task Force Updates (sataskforce.net) (https://www.sataskforce.net/updates/guidepost-solutions-report-of-the-independent-investigation)

[4] The Southern Baptist Convention's Double Trauma - The Atlantic (https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/05/southern-baptist-convention-abuse-report/630173/)

[5] Mass Shootings in 2022: A Partial List - The New York Times (nytimes.com) (https://www.nytimes.com/article/mass-shootings-2022.html)

[6] Berachos, Guides - Berachos - Beracha Levatala - Din - Ask the Rabbi (dinonline.org) (https://dinonline.org/2011/03/01/berachos-beracha-levatala/)

[7] A Culture That Kills Its Children Has No Future - The Atlantic (https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/05/uvalde-texas-robb-elementary-school-culture-death/638435/)

[8] Straight White American Jesus, podcast episode: May 27, Weekly Roundup – Guns Over People (GOP). (https://straightwhiteamericanjesus.com/series/straight-white-american-jesus/). This episode has excellent observations and commentary by a couple of scholars who study the intersection of religion and culture on both the Uvalde massacre and the SBC abuse report.

[9] Feasting on the Word: Year C, Volume 2, Easter 7, Revelation, Pastoral Perspective (Kindle version).

[10] Here I am thinking about different kinds of ethical frameworks: deontological vs. teleological and virtue ethics.

Sunday, June 19, 2016

Sermon–When Zeal Consumes (1 Kings 19:1-18)

The following is the manuscript of the sermon I preached at the Presbyterian Church. The key question is: What does God’s response and actions found in 1 Kings 19:1-18 say about Elijah’s actions of 1 Kings 18?


When encountering today’s passage, many sermons focus on the “still, small voice” (v.12). A common theme is how God’s voice can’t be heard in the busy-ness and noise of life, and that we need to get away if we want to hear him.

Another approach might be to take Elijah’s anxiety and fear in running away from Jezebel and go into a discussion of how he ought to have trusted in God and stayed put, or perhaps a message about how to cope with discouragement and depression.

I think there is good case and support for each of these approaches. Yet what struck me as I read through the passage this time was what I perceived as similarities to Jonah chapter 4. It’s a short chapter so I’ll read it now in its entirety.

Jonah 4:1 Now this greatly displeased Jonah, and he became angry. 2 He prayed to the Lord and said, “O Lord! Is this not what I said while I was still in my own land? This is the reason that I fled before to Tarshish, because I knew that You are a gracious God and merciful, slow to anger, abundant in faithfulness, and ready to relent from punishment. 3 Therefore, Lord, take my life from me, for it is better for me to die than to live.”

4 Then the Lord said, “Is it right for you to be angry?”

5 So Jonah went out of the city and sat down east of the city and made for himself a booth there. He sat under it in the shade, waiting to see what would happen to the city. 6 Then the Lord God appointed a plant, and it grew up over Jonah to provide shade over his head, to provide comfort from his grief. And Jonah was very happy about the plant. 7 But at dawn the next day, God appointed a worm to attack the plant so that it withered. 8 When the sun rose, God appointed a scorching east wind, and the sun beat upon the head of Jonah so that he became faint and asked that he might die. He said, “It is better for me to die than to live.”

9 Then God said to Jonah, “Is it right for you to be angry about the plant?”

And Jonah replied, “It is right for me to be angry, even to death.”

10 The Lord said, “You are troubled about the plant for which you did not labor and did not grow. It came up in a night and perished in a night. 11 Should I not, therefore, be concerned about Nineveh, that great city, in which there are more than a hundred and twenty thousand people, who do not know their right hand from their left, and also many animals?” (MEV)

So here are particular points of similarities to note:

  • Both Elijah and Jonah had fled
  • Both ask God to take their lives
  • In both cases, God’s response comes in simple questions
  • Both situate themselves in a solitary place
  • God provides miraculous provisions in both cases
  • Wild natural events occur in both stories
  • God asks questions twice
  • In both cases the response from Elijah and Jonah repeat their first responses
  • In both cases God’s final response is about a large number of individuals

What shall we make of this? Is it merely coincidence? The book of Kings was placed into its final form sometime during or closely after the Jewish exile in Babylon. The book of Jonah was composed sometime after that. I think it is entirely possible that the author of Jonah used the story of Elijah as a kind of template, and perhaps even as a parody rebelling retelling of the earlier account. A number of commentators suggest that there could be some connection between the two stories.

Also, according to a number of Jewish traditions regarding Elijah’s story, they see God’s command to Elijah to anoint Elisha as his replacement, and to begin traveling the region anointing leaders, as a punishment of Elijah. In other words, Elijah’s response to God’s query (in 1Ki 19) is found wanting, and Elijah is placed on a retirement path. This too, aligns with the story of Jonah where at the end is found God’s rebuke of Jonah.

The rebuke is that Jonah had perceived God incorrectly, that Jonah’s desires about those who are “against God” are inappropriate. And so I began to wonder if something similar could be seen in Elijah’s story.

We need to back up and quickly review Elijah’s story prior to 1 Kings 19. Elijah was called to speak against Ahab and announce a drought. For three years the drought continued while Elijah was hidden and provided for, first through ravens and then through a widow in a foreign land. At the end of the three years God commands Elijah to “go and present [himself] to Ahab, and [God] will send rain upon the earth” (1Ki 18:1). Elijah does so and sets up a showdown between his God, and Baal and Asherah. It takes place on Mt. Carmel where Elijah’s God is shown to be the victor and Elijah commands the people to seize and kill all the prophets of Baal and Asherah, which they do. And this is where chapter 19 picks up with Ahab telling his wife, Jezebel, of what had happened. She gets angry and declares Elijah a traitor and enemy of the state. Elijah flees.

Now, the frequent interpretation I’ve heard growing up in the church of this preceding set of stories is how wonderful it is that God showed himself to be right, and how fitting it is that evil was destroyed. It’s a “Go God!” story, showing how God will vindicate himself.

But is it really?

Often when we read stories like these, we make the assumption that because things turn out in favor of God and the righteous, that what happened must be right and God’s will. In this case because God sends down fire on Mt. Carmel, it must have been his will, and that the subsequent action taken by Elijah was also God’s will.

But was it really?

What if Elijah was overstepping his bounds? What if Elijah had assumed things about God and was acting upon his own ideas about how he thought God would respond and about what he thought God wanted?

I’ve already laid out some evidence from Jonah and from Jewish commentators as to why an alternate reading is plausible. Now I’d like to show why I think the text of 1 Kings 18 and 19 itself supports this alternate interpretation.

First, in the command God gives to Elijah about returning to Ahab, God’s command is to “present himself [Elijah] to Ahab” and then the rain will return. There is nothing here about God commanding a showdown or a demonstration of power. This reminds me of Moses and his action at Meribah (Numbers 20). In biblical interpretation, Elijah is seen as a type of Moses, so it should not be surprising that the chronicler of Elijah might allude in some ways to Moses’ life events. At Meribah, the people are complaining about a lack of water. God commands Moses to speak to a rock, but instead, Moses, in his anger, strikes the rock twice. In spite of Moses’ actions God supplies water, but Moses is punished by not being allowed to enter the Promised Land. In this story Moses oversteps God’s commands and carries out his own desires. Perhaps the chronicler of Elijah is alluding to this story about Moses. I believe it is quite likely that the entire showdown at Mt. Carmel (that also, incidentally, uses water) was of Elijah going beyond God’s command. God still manifests himself through a sign, but it can be interpreted as not what God desired to happen. And the slaughter of the prophets of Baal? Quite possibly overzealousness on Elijah’s part, and his imitating surrounding culture in how opposing prophets were handled by victorious powers.

When God finally speaks to Elijah (in 1Ki 19) after fleeing Jezebel, there is no commendation of Elijah’s prior actions. Rather there seems to be a sense of rebuke. Elijah’s response is that he was defending God’s honor (“I’ve been zealous for the Lord”), and by pointing out that he was all alone in this, perhaps seeking some kind of pity and affirmation. But God offers neither. This happens twice. And Elijah’s response is identical both times.

In between the two conversations a violent storm, an earthquake, and fire come, but God is not in any of them. These are metaphors associated with violent judgment. But when God finally speaks, it is not through any of them but rather, in “a still, small voice.” Perhaps this is an explanation that the fire that came down on Mt. Carmel was more about Elijah’s desires rather than God’s. Perhaps this is God trying to tell Elijah that power and violence are not the means of reaching the hearts of people. I think here, Jonah’s story is the counterpoint, where merely speaking changes people’s hearts.

God asks again what Elijah is doing here, and Elijah gives an identical response, word for word. It seems clear that Elijah has failed to comprehend God and his methods of working with humans, even with those that fail to acknowledge him. Jewish commentaries suggest that Elijah’s failure was to consider God’s mercy and compassion as greater than his power and vengeance. It appears his zeal has consumed his ability to be merciful or to even think about it as a possibility. There is still work for Elijah, but it is in wrapping up his time on earth and appointing a successor.

I hope you can see now that Elijah's confrontation with the prophets of Baal on Mt. Carmel, often seen as an example for us to confront forcefully those we think are opposing God, could be the antithesis of what the storyteller in this passage really wanted the reader to understand. In the broader picture, this could be a story about people overzealously claiming things for God that God himself wants no part of.

I think we should be extremely wary of any claims to force, power, and violence as tools that God desires or uses. I think we should be very careful in how we defend God, if we ever feel the need arises. I think we need to re-read the Bible with more nuance and not automatically assume that because something turned out okay, God must have desired things to come about in the manner described. I think our frequent desire for judgment and vengeance is more a reflection about our nature than about God’s. I don’t think we can ever exaggerate the magnitude of God’s love, mercy, and compassion.

Whenever we are confused about how to respond to another person, favor the way of love, mercy, and compassion – with no ulterior motives and with no strings attached. Don’t let your zeal for God consume your mercy and love for others.