Sunday, April 09, 2023

Sermon: Victory and Vindication

 

Texts: Acts 10:34-43; Psalm 118:1-2, 14-24; Matthew 28:1-10

Lectionary: Easter Sunday Year A

It was mid-morning on Friday.[1] Acceding to the demands of religious rulers, Roman soldiers had secured Jesus on the cross and driven spikes through his hands and feet. The cross was raised and then dropped into a hole in the ground.

Any hope and joy that was present earlier in the week had long since evaporated. From his entry into Jerusalem, followed by the overturning of tables at the Temple, and his apparent victories in honor contests with religious leaders all seemed like something from a long-distant dream of another world. What was left was a sense of utter defeat and hopelessness.

The leaders who had demanded Jesus’ crucifixion now joined with the soldiers to mock him. They had secured victory over Jesus. The honor they had been losing to Jesus for the past few years had now been recovered. They had finally shamed and defeated Jesus.

Nearly all Jesus’ disciples had fled and gone into hiding. There was only shame left to be associated with Jesus. And the disciples may have thought that the leaders, perhaps sensing blood and also a potential threat from not completely eradicating Jesus’ movement, they would be coming after the disciples, too.

But many of the women followers and disciples of Jesus remained at Calvary, taking it all in. Perhaps they held out hope that Jesus still might get delivered somehow. But the hours passed, and mid-afternoon, around 3 o’clock, Jesus cried out and died. Simultaneously, a great earthquake shook the earth.

Even so, the women stayed and continued to watch. Among them were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Joseph, and the mother of Zebedee’s sons, James and John. This was the same mother who had not too long ago asked for Jesus to allow her sons to sit on either side of Jesus in his kingdom.[2] At that time the two, James and John, had said that they could drink from Jesus’ cup, yet they were nowhere to be seen at the cross.[3] It was, ironically, their mother who remained to bear witness.

As the sun began to make its way toward the western horizon and darkness began to creep in from the east, the women saw Joseph of Arimathea arrive with some of his servants, tools, and supplies. They went up to where Jesus’ now lifeless body still hung. They took the cross, lifted it up out of the ground, and laid it gently back down on the ground. They pried out the spikes and untied the cords that were holding Jesus in place. One of the servants unrolled a brand new, linen cloth. They gently lifted Jesus’ broken, bruised, battered, and blood soaked body up from the cross and onto the cloth. They carefully wrapped the cloth around Jesus, and then carried him off the hill.

Mary Magdalene and the other Mary followed the men down the hill and watched as the body was laid in Joseph’s tomb. They watched as a large stone was rolled in front to seal it. There was a sense of finality about this. Jesus was dead. Jesus was buried. Jesus was gone.

Yet, there was something that these women had heard from Jesus’ mouth that nagged at the back of their minds. It was something about a resurrection on the third day.[4] Amidst their grief and sorrow, there was a pinpoint of hope. Yet, they had seen Jesus die. They saw Jesus get placed into the tomb. They remained silent, and sat down on rocks near the tomb. With tear-filled eyes and heaving sobs, they looked at the large stone covering the tomb and then at one another and back.

It was now getting dark and they would have to return to where they were staying; perhaps the home of Mary, Martha, and Lazarus in Bethany. They thought about Lazarus, and how Jesus commanded the stone covering Lazarus’ tomb to be moved. They could still hear Jesus’ voice as he called for Lazarus to come out of the tomb. Could something similar happen again? But Jesus was dead. It just didn’t seem possible that Jesus could be resurrected. Who could call Jesus out of the tomb?

Now back in Bethany, the Sabbath had begun. They wanted to return to the tomb, to take care of Jesus’ body as they would have, if they had had time. But that would have to wait until after the Sabbath.

In the meantime, the Temple leaders decided that the priority of the institution, and maintaining their authority and honor superseded that of keeping to the traditions of Sabbath observance that they themselves taught. They went to Pilate and asked for guards to seal the tomb until after the third day. Pilate granted their request, sending a group of soldiers with them, and they ensured that the tomb would be secure.

On the First Day, as the first morning twilight began to pierce through the darkness, Mary and the other Mary quickly exited where they were staying to make their way back to the tomb. Neither had slept. As the first rays of dawn began to rise up over the horizon, they arrived at the tomb. They saw that a large group of Roman soldiers had sprouted next to the tomb, sometime during their absence.

Before they could try to make sense of it, an extremely bright light, much brighter than the sun, seemed to zip down from the still-dark sky, strike next to the stone covering the tomb, and in that same instant a great earthquake shook the ground. From the location where the light struck, a figure emerged and quickly rolled away the stone and sat on it.

Mary and Mary quickly grabbed onto some olive trees that were nearby to keep from falling to the ground. The soldiers were not quite so fortunate, as they tried to steady themselves against the rocks and against one another. But like dominoes, they tumbled to the ground and remained stunned.

The figure on the stone called out to the women, “Don’t be afraid. I know that you are looking for Jesus who was crucified. He isn’t here, because he’s been raised from the dead, just as he said. Come, see the place where they laid him.”[5]

Could it be true? They quickly glanced at one another. With fear but also a glimmer of hope, they cautiously approached the now-open entry to the tomb. And then they went in. As their eyes adjusted to the dimmer light, they searched for Jesus’ body. On Friday they witnessed him being placed inside. And yet they saw nothing coming out of the tomb just now.[6] They had seen the soldiers outside. Why would they be here if the body had somehow been moved the day prior?

Jesus’ body was not inside. How could that be? It doesn’t make any sense. Except… What Jesus had said was true, and what this being outside said is also true, confirming what Jesus said.

They exited the tomb. The being spoke to the women once more. “Now hurry, go and tell his disciples, ‘He’s been raised from the dead. He’s going on ahead of you to Galilee. You will see him there.’ I’ve given the message to you.”[7]

Mary and Mary were given the first message of the resurrection and commissioned to relay the message to all the other disciples! They looked at one another again, and no words had to be spoken. With great excitement but also great fear, they began to run. They were about to head into full sprint, something they hadn’t done since they were little girls. That’s when they suddenly realized they were about to run into a man who seemed to appear out of nowhere. They tried to put on the brakes. They stumbled around. They grabbed onto each other to keep from falling headfirst to the ground.

“Greetings!” said the man they had almost run into.

The two women immediately recognized the voice and having had a chance to look into his face, they realized it was Jesus! It was true. Jesus was raised from the dead. Jesus is alive! Now they fell to the ground and took hold of Jesus’ feet. They worshiped him.

The military power and might of Rome could not keep Jesus in the tomb. In fact, his resurrection has turned the soldiers, who were there to keep Jesus in the tomb, almost like dead men. All of the plotting by the temple and religious authorities to keep Jesus shamed through death had been turned upside down. Now it would be they who were shamed for their treatment of Jesus and it was they who would have to find some way to explain their actions.

The political state might look to its ability to use violence and death, and the threat to use them, as the ultimate projection of its power and strength. Power and control are the world’s means of maintaining authority over its subjects. But Jesus’ resurrection is a reversal of the world’s systems. Jesus’ resurrection is victory over all the world’s domination systems. Jesus’ resurrection is vindication that his way and his kingdom is the only way to life.

Jesus’ way and his kingdom is a reversal: instead of amassing power, it gives it away. Instead of looking out primarily for oneself, it looks out for the well-being of all. Instead of force and compulsion, freedom. Instead of coercion, persuasion. Instead of violence and its promotion, peace and its tools. Instead of death and the tools of death, life. Instead of fear; hope, love and compassion.

Then Jesus said to the two women, “Do not be afraid; go and tell my brothers and sisters to go to Galilee; there they will see me.”[8]

They resumed their running. It was as if supernatural strength and endurance carried them on wings.  Praising God, rejoicing, and laughing with excitement, they sprinted toward the place where they knew the other disciples were still hiding, cowering in grief and fear.

The rest of the story is, in part, found with us. We are the beneficiaries and inheritors of that original message, entrusted to two Marys.

Jesus is alive! Christ is risen!

May the God who creates, raise us to new life again.

May the God who accepts, raise our capacity for love and compassion.

May the God who unsettles, raise our discomfort with the ways of this world.



[1] Most of the imagined narrative given here is based on Matthew’s account of Good Friday through Resurrection Day. Other accounts occasionally fill in a few details and some creative license has been taken to flesh out the narrative. However, I have done my best to stay close to the Matthean text while providing for continuity.

[2] Matthew 20:20-23.

[3] Traditionally, John 19:26-27, where “disciple whom he loved” is found is taken as referring to the disciple John. If that is the case, then it would mean that at least one male disciple remained near the cross. But there is debate as to whom the phrase refers to. It may be an editorial addition by the author of the gospel according to John (whose authorship we do not know) for this gospel’s own theological reasons. The Synoptics only mention women as remaining near the cross. Other individuals whom scholars suggest might be the “disciple whom Jesus loved” include Lazarus and John Mark. C.f., Who Was John the Apostle? The Beginner's Guide - OverviewBible (https://overviewbible.com/john-the-apostle/)

[4] Matthew 20:17-19. C.f., Borg and Crossan, The Last Week (chapter 4), discussion of the unnamed woman who anointed Jesus in Mark 14:3-9 where among the many women disciples who followed Jesus, this woman appears to have understood Jesus’ predictions of his suffering, death, and resurrection. Thus, it may be that other women disciples may have also had some degree of understanding that Jesus would be resurrected in some manner.

[5] Matthew 28:5b-6 (CEB)

[6] Matthew’s account comes closest to where any description of the actual event of the resurrection takes place. If Jesus’ body had appeared from the tomb, it should be found here. But it is not. The other gospel accounts only note that the tomb is already open and empty.

[7] Matthew 28:7 (CEB)

[8] Matthew 28:10 (CEB)


Sunday, April 02, 2023

Sermon: Procession, Politics, Parody

Lectionary: Palm Sunday (A)
Text: Matthew 21:1-11

Parades!

Parades are a common feature in many societies and cultures. In America parades are frequently associated with celebratory events and holidays. They represent a coming together of communities, a display of diversity, pride in community, and an expression of joy and celebration.

In certain other parts of the world, parades are often militaristic in nature. They are a means by which authoritarian regimes seek to retain power by threat and intimidation, both against their own citizens and to the watching world.

And after a long but victorious conflict, nearly all nations honor those who fought and served by hosting a parade in which the victors march and are given accolades.

In our small community, we have parades in which all are welcome to participate. We have a parade for the Christmas Tree lighting, for St. Patrick’s Day, during the Little Norway Festival, and for Fourth of July. We also have parades that honor achievements by students: for sports teams that return with championships and for the graduation class.

When Elise and I visited New Orleans several years ago, we learned about the “Second Line” that forms after nearly all parades and processions in that city. The parade might be for a festival, it might be for a wedding, or it might be for a funeral. Whatever the reason for the parade, there is celebration, even for a funeral, and anyone is allowed to join the Second Line to participate in the occasion.

When I thought about parades and New Orleans, my mind next went to Mardi Gras. Mardi Gras is most frequently associated now with drinking and debauchery, but there are colorful parades, costumes, and masks. The name and the event came from the French and their celebration of Fat Tuesday. And then with the virtual hop to France, it isn’t difficult to think about the elaborate costumes and masks and imagine the Carnival in Venice, Italy, which Elise and I both visited and saw some of these in person.

Costumes, Masks, Reversals

A theme runs through celebrations and festivals predating Christian Carnival, through medieval Carnival, and into today’s expressions of the festival. The theme is a part of the costumes and masks that are frequently used during the festivities. This theme is that of reversal of social roles and norms, that of equalizing social status, and through theatrics expose issues found in maintaining the status quo. Many festivals, at least for one day a year, through use of costumes and masks remove the usual social status markers, allowing some semblance of equality to occur, from slaves to kings.

One can find similar themes in the Jewish celebration of Purim, which coincidentally or not, occurs around the same time of year. Masks and costumes may be seen. Men dressing as women, and women dressing as men may be part of some celebrations. Encouraged too, was drinking to excess so that one could no longer distinguish between Haman and Mordecai. These means of celebrating may sound odd to our ears, but they can each be (arguably) traced to themes found in the story of Esther and how justice eventually prevails.[1],[2]

The idea of reversal of social structures and the status quo as a means of finding a path to justice, thus, is not unique to a single culture or religion, but could be understood as a common theme across many of them.

Palm Sunday Entry as a Parody

In the Palm Sunday story of Jesus entering Jerusalem, he too, employs theatrics to parody the social structures, religious systems, and political powers emanating from this city to support them.[3]

Secrecy of a Planned Act

First, when we read carefully, we can see that the precise details of Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem was most likely a planned action. When we read that Jesus sent a couple of his disciples on ahead to bring back a donkey and a colt, it could be divine foreknowledge, but a more obvious interpretation is that this was prearranged, with code phrases and a cloak of secrecy around it.

Why so much secrecy? If word got out too early and to too many, the activity happening could be misinterpreted and misunderstood. Those who had had been following Jesus for the past few years seem to have gotten to the understanding that Jesus was likely not going to overthrow the Romans and their Jewish collaborators as the coming conquering king. So, their response to, “Who is Jesus?”, from the inhabitants of Jerusalem was, “This is the prophet [emphasis mine] Jesus from Nazareth in Galilee.”

There were at least two very different visions of what the Messiah might be when he arrived. The first was as a Davidic king to take back the throne and reign over the Jews. But there was another Messianic expectation, that he would be more in the lines of a prophet or a priest. Jesus proclaimed a kingdom of God, but it would not have as its head a traditional king in the ways of human expectations.

Thus, to reduce the risk of any kind of false expectations of Jesus arriving into Jerusalem as a conquering king might have triggered, he kept things quiet and hidden until the last possible moment. For anyone parading into Jerusalem riding an animal such as a horse or even a donkey could be interpreted as an entry of a king. When the succession of Solomon from David was in question, one of the acts employed to legitimate David’s choice was to have Solomon ride one of David’s mules to the location of his anointing as the new king.[4]

A Political Act

The riding of an animal into Jerusalem was a political act. But the manner of doing so, without an army and instead, only peasants, can be seen as a parody of the dominant powers and practices of that time. For around the same time, perhaps even on the same day, Pontius Pilate would have also arrived in Jerusalem. This was Passover week, the week in which Jews celebrated the long-ago deliverance from Egyptian oppressors. The air would be pregnant with unspoken “what if?” and “when?” questions by the Jews. Pilate’s arrival was to enforce Roman authority, to keep the peace (through threats, force, and violence), discourage any would-be rebellion, and quell any disturbances as quickly and efficiently as possible. He would have arrived on a horse, at the head of his imperial cavalry and soldiers. It would have been an impressive sight of Roman might, armor and weapons, and sure to discourage anyone from carrying out nefarious plans. Most of the city would likely have been quiet while the procession passed, with only the beating of drums, the clip-clop of the hooves, the pounding of the ground, and sounds of armor against armor.[5]

Jesus’ entry, while following a pattern of a royal entry, mocks the reigning powers and domination systems. There is nothing grand or impressive about it. Yet there was celebration and expectations and shouts of acclamation, quite unlike that of Pilate’s arrival.

As a side note, Matthew makes a distinction between the crowds that followed Jesus into Jerusalem and the inhabitants of the city. Commonly, the crowd that turned against Jesus at the trial is equated with the crowd that shouted acclamations to Jesus, but that may not be the case, as many recent biblical scholars have pointed out.

The Messiah's Rule, According to Matthew

Matthew includes a quotation that is derived from Zechariah 9:9. We read this during the readings. I am reading it again to remind us of what this prophetic text says about the kind of Messiah that Matthew wants his readers to see and understand about Jesus:

Rejoice greatly, O daughter Zion!
    Shout aloud, O daughter Jerusalem!
See, your king comes to you;
    triumphant and victorious is he,
humble and riding on a donkey,
    on a colt, the foal of a donkey.
10 He will cut off the chariot from Ephraim
    and the war horse from Jerusalem;
and the battle bow shall be cut off,
    and he shall command peace to the nations;
his dominion shall be from sea to sea
    and from the River to the ends of the earth. (Zechariah 9:9-10 NRSVue)

The Messiah does rule, but not with any of the conventional methods and tools employed by human rulers. His attitude is humility. He does away with war, violence, and the tools used to make war and cause violence. By extension, too, because these tools are done away, there can be no threats and coercion as means to rule and maintain authority. Peace is the only tool and method employed by the Messiah.

Fools and Foolishness

I think that “What kind of a fool is this Messiah?” is a legitimate question.

When you and I think “fool”, it could mean someone who does or says things even when they should know better, someone who is unwise, and someone who acts unintelligently. That’s probably the most common present-day understanding of a fool.

But a fool could be a (capital-)Fool, a position held in some medieval royal courts, also known as the Jester. This Fool was at the court to entertain, but they generally enjoyed what was held as Jester’s Privilege. This privilege allowed the Jester or the Fool to parody those in authority, including the monarch, without fear of punishment. This meant that the Fool was in a unique position to speak truth to power, through the use of theatrics and comedy, that no one else could. This Fool was no unwise person, nor someone unintelligent. This individual had to be extremely wise, intelligent, and creative. Shakespeare’s King Lear has the character of a Fool who is the only one able to speak the truth to Lear, but the real fool (using our more common definition) is Lear who refuses to listen to the Fool.

It could be said that Jesus played the part of the Fool in the Palm Sunday theatrics. He parodied the reigning powers of Rome, and the authorities in Jerusalem that collaborated with Rome. He rode into Jerusalem, ahead of a procession, with an alternative kingdom vision. But Jesus did not enjoy the Jester’s Privilege, for his alternative vision collided with the status quo, and by the end of the week the status quo determined that their place in society and history must remain and Jesus must go.

But the foolishness that Jesus embodied and the foolishness of the gospel would outlast the Roman empire. We aren’t told where Pharisee Saul, who would later become known as Apostle Paul, was at the trial of Jesus. But if he was there, he most certainly would have been forcefully demanding the execution of Jesus.

But by the time Paul writes the First Letter to the Corinthians, his tune had completely changed. In the first part of the letter he writes,

18 For the message about the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written,

“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise,
    and the discernment of the discerning I will thwart.”

20 Where is the one who is wise? Where is the scholar? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? 21 For since, in the wisdom of God, the world did not know God through wisdom, God decided, through the foolishness of the proclamation, to save those who believe. 22 For Jews ask for signs and Greeks desire wisdom, 23 but we proclaim Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to gentiles, 24 but to those who are the called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25 For God’s foolishness is wiser than human wisdom, and God’s weakness is stronger than human strength. (1 Corinthians 1:18-25 NRSVue)

Reversals as the Gospel's Foolishness

The gospel and the kingdom of God is foolishness because it is a complete reversal of the world’s structures and systems. To any reasonable mind, if the gospel is fully embraced, it cannot work. The idea that there is no hierarchy, there are no power differentials, everyone receives what they need and give everything else away, etc. makes no sense in this world. The principles of the kingdom simply cannot work. Anyone trying it would become impoverished, taken advantage of, and become a laughingstock.

Yet… That is what Jesus is calling for his followers to do.

 24 Then Jesus told his disciples, “If any wish to come after me, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me. 25 For those who want to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake will find it. (Matthew 16:24-25 NRSVue)

Jesus, in very clear terms, states that to follow him is to take up the cross, embrace its foolishness and become a Fool.

Called to be Fools?

And once again, I don’t have answers, because like you I’m attached to this world. I have a life here, that even if not perfect, is pretty good. I find it mostly easy to refuse to succumb to using violence and its tools to get my way. But going down the list, I find that coercion and threats can be useful at times. And then I get to the more socially acceptable power structures based on wealth, position, and social status. And using those methods to advance my agenda is far more difficult to reject and avoid.

And yet Jesus, in the hours leading up to his crucifixion and death refused to employ any of them to save himself. Jesus responded to violence with forgiveness. Jesus refused to defend himself with any kind of threats or coercion. Jesus could have called on his divine powers and asserted his position and status, yet he did not.

As we enter Holy Week, let us look to Jesus and how he navigated the tension of living in this world yet living by the principles of God’s kingdom. May our thoughts be guided by God’s Spirit as we examine our own lives and perhaps find those places where we are too attached to this world and its ways.

After his entry into Jerusalem, Jesus overturned tables at the Temple. Do we have the courage to allow God to overturn our attachments to the ways of the world and instead become wise, intelligent, and creative (capital letter-F) Fools for the gospel of Jesus Christ and the kingdom of God?


[4] 1 Kings 1.

[5] Borg, Marcus and Crossan, John Dominic. The Last Week, chapter 1, “Palm Sunday”. This chapter contains an imagined account of Jesus’ entry and Pilate’s entry into Jerusalem occurring on the same day.