Monday, February 27, 2023

Sermon: Letting Go

Lectionary: Lent 1A

Texts: Genesis 2:15-17; 3:1-7; Psalm 32; Romans 5:12-19; Matthew 4:1-11

Forty Days

The gospel reading for today highlights two of the most common features or practices associated with the season of Lent. The first is the duration – forty days. The second is the practice of fasting. There may be an allusion to a possible third feature, the idea of a test or trial, that may be found in the reading that is also associated with Lent.

Jesus, Moses, Israel

In Matthew’s gospel, the temptation account is placed immediately before the Sermon on the Mount. The forty days and nights parallel the time Moses spent on Mount Sinai.[1] A possible related parallel is that Moses spent time in the wilderness of Midian where he encountered God.[2] As I have discussed before, Matthew portrays Jesus as a new Moses, and therefore it is important to show these parallels between Moses and Jesus.

In addition, however, Jesus is also shown to be the beginning of a new, perfect Israel. The first Israel was forced to spend forty years in the wilderness after failing to trust that God would lead them to possess the land promised to them.[3] These forty years was a period of testing.[4] In fact Jesus’ response to the first test comes directly from a passage in Deuteronomy that describes Israel’s forty years of testing:

Remember the long way that the Lord your God has led you these forty years in the wilderness, in order to humble you, testing you to know what was in your heart, whether or not you would keep his commandments. He humbled you by letting you hunger, then by feeding you with manna, with which neither you nor your ancestors were acquainted, in order to make you understand that one does not live by bread alone but by every word that comes from the mouth of the Lord. (Deuteronomy 8:2-3, NRSVue)

In spite of the great signs and wonders that God had performed to bring the Israelites out of bondage, once faced with the wilderness the ancient Israelites failed to trust God. They failed to trust that God would sustain them.[5] They are recorded as having “tested the Lord” when they accused God of bringing them into the wilderness to kill them with thirst.[6] And they failed to trust in God when Moses was long on Sinai, and they instead turned to crafting a golden calf to lead them.[7]

Jesus Succeeds Where Others Failed

In Matthew 4, Jesus faces the same types of tests. He is first tested on whether or not he will trust God to provide. He is next tested on whether to test God by presuming on a taken-out-of-context scripture that promises God’s protection. Jesus’ third and final test is who and what will lead his life. Where ancient Israel failed these tests, Jesus succeeds and passes the test. In each case, Jesus chooses to trust in what he knows is true about God. Jesus does not use his own power to provide for himself. Jesus does not needlessly test God’s words through reckless actions. And Jesus rejects the temptation of power and control as a means of achieving his ends, and instead trusts in God’s schedule and arrangements.

Through his success in meeting these trials, Jesus shows that he is a fit representative of a new community that will fulfill the promise and mission that was given to Israel.

I need to clarify here that this is not saying that Israel was replaced. The new community is being formed out of Israel and Israel will always be a fundamental part of the community, but its composition will become global and embrace all of humanity. The Apostle Paul struggles with the question of “what happens with Israel?” in his letter to the Romans.[8] We will not get into that question this time, but we will turn to Paul and his letter to the Romans now.

Jesus as the New Adam

Paul takes the parallel with Jesus all the way back to Adam. Whereas the first representative human failed to trust God and brought death to not just humankind, but to all creation, Jesus’ trust in God, even to the cross, brings redemption to all of creation.[9]

Not surprisingly, Jesus’ wilderness trials parallel what Adam and Eve faced in the Garden of Eden. The trials, the tests, the temptations involve:

1)     Sustenance and food and who controls how it is given. Do I accept what is given and any limits, or do I go beyond what is allowed? Do I seize (or miraculously create) what is normally not available, because I can wield power?

2)     Trusting God’s words or instead test them. Do we doubt the fences and guardrails that God has fashioned? Do we seize upon some of God’s words and try to utilize them for our own benefit or to use against others?

3)     “I know better,” “I’ll do it my way,” vs. “I’ll trust God to do it God’s way in God’s time.”

The Lure of Power Offered as Solution to Life

The common theme across all three temptations is power and control. The temptations attempt to appeal to some of the basic anxieties that arise from the precariousness and uncertainties of life on planet Earth. The temptation offer power and control as the solution to life’s uncertainties.

“Will I have enough?” is a question of basic needs and sustenance. But the history of human civilizations and societies, from ancient times to now, show that for many people, the answer to the question is always, “No.” The fear of losing what one already has, however little or much, leads to ever more amassing of wealth. The desire to have more respects no wealth boundaries. From the destitute to the ultra-wealthy, more is a common refrain. The desire to obtain goods through unethical and even illicit means is a temptation for all, but perhaps even more so for those who have the power and the means to get away with it. One need not look too far from modern businesses to see many who have succumbed to this temptation. And what’s more, unless the offense is egregious, society tacitly gives its approval. The end goal, if it could be achieved, is for a person to be able to be completely self-reliant.

“Will I be safe?” is another question about basic needs. We all long for security, predictability, and comfort in this life. But as natural disasters, wars, gun violence, and so much more take place day after day, there is no such thing as a guarantee of safety in this life. For many people there is little they can do to improve the odds of keeping safe. For others, perhaps many of us here, we do have some means to attempt to improve our security. We might upgrade to better locks. Purchase an alarm system and security cameras. Some may choose to arm themselves. We could include in this arena of security the desire to live forever. The end goal of ultimate security is eternal life that is crafted based on my personal preferences.

“Do I have any significance?” is a question of identity, meaning, and purpose. One way to secure a semblance of identity and purpose is to achieve a degree of power. Those who have power are not ignored. They have the means to get things done, and that means others will come knocking on the door and asking for favors. With enough power, a person can do pretty much anything that they want. So the pursuit of power, much like the pursuit of wealth, becomes an endless one. There is never enough power. One can always have a little bit more. The goal of ultimate power is to answer to no one, to craft a world in which everything and everyone caters to my interests.

Avoiding the Lure

Jesus rejects the offer of each of these temptations. He rejects the temptation to provide for himself. He rejects the temptation to use his position and power to demand security and protection of his life. And finally, Jesus rejects the temptation to fashion his identity, meaning, and purpose based on power over the world. Jesus rejects the identity and purpose of a Messiah formed around the world’s expectations of what a Messiah should be.

The desires for adequate sustenance, reasonable security, and for identity, meaning, and purpose are legitimate. After all, in the Lord’s Prayer we pray, “Give us today our daily bread.”[10] Jesus addresses the problem of worrying by saying, “Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more than food and the body more than clothing? … But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well.”[11] As for identity and purpose, Jesus tells us that we are salt and light representing God to the world.[12]

Letting Go

What if this Lent we really attempt to trust what Jesus has revealed about God and God’s care for us? What if we give up our desire to control our lives (and that often leads to controlling others as well)? What if we let go of the pursuit of material security and prosperity that the world assures us we need? What if we let go of worrying about our safety and future? What if we let go of trying to conform our identity and purpose to the expectations of the world?

Jesus trusted in God to provide for his provisions and his well-being. Jesus had heard God already declare that he was God’s son, and he held on to that identity.

This Lenten season, let us take time to reflect on how we might be pursuing desires that are not of God, and instead redirect our desires to be in alignment with what God wants for us, our families, our churches, and our communities.

Resist the temptations to cling to empty promises of prosperity, security, and power to fulfill our desires. Instead, let them go and find in Christ all that we need for this life and the life to come.



[1] Exodus 24:18.

[2] Exodus 3.

[3] Numbers 14:33, 34.

[4] Deuteronomy 8:2, 3.

[5] Exodus 16.

[6] Exodus 17.

[7] Exodus 32.

[8] Romans 9-11.

[9] Romans 8:19-23.

[10] Matthew 6:11.

[11] Matthew 6:25, 33.

[12] Matthew 5:13-16.


Sunday, February 12, 2023

Sermon: The Little Things

Lectionary: Epiphany 6A

Text: Matthew 5:21-37

Introduction – Global Concerns

Ayıntaplı, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

On Monday [Feb. 6, 2023] a violent and catastrophic earthquake hit the region of Turkey and Syria, causing major devastation and thousands of lost lives. Global aid has been quick to respond, but the magnitude of the destruction and difficulties with the terrain and logistics have made it difficult for aid workers.

Later this month will mark the anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The war continues and the best analysis is that Russia will try to escalate the conflict. Several million residents have fled their homes; many thousands, both military and civilian, have been killed. Cities and villages have been destroyed, and those who remain suffer from lack of sufficient infrastructure, lack of basic necessities, and the cold. Aid from many quarters and organizations continue to pour in, yet there is still no end in sight.

These are, but just two of the more recent catastrophic global incidents that take up our attention. It doesn’t take much effort to come up with other incidents that vie for our attention and concern. Go to a site like Global Giving and one can find scores of needs around the globe: from disaster response, climate action, educational needs, food security, and more.

In this kind of present-day context, we encounter the text for today. To be frank, I struggled with this text’s relevance for me in February 2023. What relevance does Jesus’ midrash, or commentary, on Jewish law have for any of us right now? How does a stricter interpretation of ancient laws relate to the 21st century?

Sermon on the Mount, an Overview

William Hole, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Today’s text is from a portion of Matthew’s gospel frequently referred to as the Sermon on the Mount. When the entirety of the Sermon is examined, it addresses mostly relationships within the kingdom of heaven that is being inaugurated by Jesus. It has almost nothing directly concerned with larger global, or even national affairs. It is mostly about how citizens of this new society or community are to live.

I will be taking a somewhat different approach today. Instead of focusing this time specifically on today’s text, I want to get a higher altitude look at the overall Sermon on the Mount and in doing so, perhaps better understand how all the pieces fit together.

The Sermon as Vision-Casting

I’m sure that most of us are familiar with vision and mission statements. If you’ve worked or volunteered for any kind of an organization, including churches, you probably have seen them. And I suspect many of you have been involved in forming or revising such statements. And some of you may even have taken the initiative to form personal vision and mission statements. These vision and mission statements are supposed to act as guides in forming organizational policies and personal behaviors.

I see in the Sermon on the Mount some similarities. The Beatitudes, which form the very beginning of the Sermon, could be likened to the vision statement of the kingdom of heaven, the new society, the community that Jesus is forming. The Beatitudes describe the characteristics that those who are part of this community will display.

At this point this community is still tiny. The Sermon is addressed directly to Jesus’ disciples, and at this point only four have been named explicitly (in Matthew 4:18-22).

Mission Statement for the Kingdom of Heaven

The next section of the Sermon is where Jesus equates the community to salt and light. I see this as the mission statement of the kingdom of heaven. The mission is not for the community to go and try to change the world, but to simply display the characteristics of the new society and by doing so perhaps those outside might be attracted into the community.

An Ideal Vision of Kingdom Life

The next section, which is not part of this year’s lectionary sequence, reveals that Jesus is not replacing the Law and the Prophets, but he is expanding on already established authorities and providing his stricter interpretations of them. Beginning with this section and the rest of the Sermon could be seen as how the vision and mission takes on more concrete forms of relational behaviors within the kingdom of heaven. These offer examples of and an aspirational look at what “love for another” looks like in action. In modern corporate-speak, these statements might be called policy statements. Our gospel text this morning forms the first few such statements.

The rest of the Sermon deals with specific topics on personal piety and how that ought to be practiced, how prayer ought to be offered, the pitfalls of wealth and what genuine treasure is, dealing with anxiety, the tendency to be judgmental, taking care of one another in the community, and what it means to live as a citizen of the kingdom of heaven.

The Sermon as a Gospel Framework and Pattern

The Sermon provides the major themes and framework for the entire gospel of Matthew. In Matthew, Jesus is meant to be seen as a new Moses. Hence just as Moses went up Mt. Sinai to receive the Law, Jesus is seen going up a mountain to offer a new interpretation of the Law for his new kingdom. The portion of Matthew preceding the Sermon offer foreshadowing of themes that will be revealed in the Sermon. The rest of the gospel account after the Sermon offer examples of how Jesus lives out the Sermon.  

Seen in its entirety, the Sermon is about how member of the new kingdom, the new society, the community, relate to one another. The community consists of those who make it a priority to look after one another’s needs. For those who have the means, to pay it forward to those who are unable. A community where authority is not lorded over another, but rather where authority is accompanied by responsibility to care for those under authority. Where justice and mercy are found in balance. A community where none strive for fame, power, or status. Where all are willing to sacrifice their own self-interest for the good of another and the community. Where each member values their own integrity and honesty such that the community has no reason to doubt the integrity of one another.

“Big” Things vs. “Little” Things

I want to return to the questions I posed toward the beginning of my sermon. Restating them with some of what I have mentioned so far: considering the huge, global concerns and needs, what relevance does the instructions for the kingdom of heaven, with its focus on relationships in the immediate community, have for me? For us?

As I thought about this question, I began to realize that in many ways it is much easier to be concerned about far-off places, about groups of people I don’t personally know and will never interact with. It’s easy to write a check and offer a prayer about a big, global concern.

But what about our family, neighbors, those with whom we work alongside, our bosses, our employees, our fellow church members?

A few verses near the end of the Sermon on the Mount grabbed my attention.

21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven. 22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ 23 Then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; go away from me, you who behave lawlessly.’ (Mathew 7:21-23 NRSVue)

This text is frequently interpreted in terms of self-righteousness; i.e., those who loudly and visibly profess to be Christian, may be leaders in Christian ministries and churches, but are only performing good works to be praised and admired by others or to fatten their wallets. None of us would ever be tempted to do that, would we?

But as I pondered the warning, I found another line of thought running through it. Perhaps it is also a warning for the rest of us against placing too much priority on working toward making a big impact on the world at the expense of taking care of those things and people that are right in front of us every day. Perhaps it is a warning against temptation to use our concern for making a big impact as a distraction and an excuse from taking care of the more immediate, little things.

The Kingdom is Relational

The Sermon on the Mount is about how members of the kingdom are to live and get along with one another, each and every day. The ones closest to us are often the ones that irritate and anger us the most. How we relate with those in our immediate circles, whether good or bad, likely won’t have a huge impact on a global scale, but it matters to God. And how we treat one another, how we handle the difficulties of relationships and differences of personalities and opinions will be seen by a slightly wider circle of those on the periphery. And that is how being salt and light works. Our mission is not to be the Great Salt Lake or a bank of searchlights. We are just a few grains of salt and perhaps a flame or a single light bulb. But that is how the relational gospel of Jesus spreads and attracts people to take a closer look.

Holding Things in Balance

I’m not saying we shouldn’t be concerned about bigger things and dismiss global needs. But what the world may view as little things – our individual relationships with one another – are as important as what the world sees as the big, important things. This is another reversal that is found in the kingdom of heaven – what the world considers less important, may be more important in God’s kingdom.

Here is how I might rewrite Matthew 7:21-23 considering today’s thoughts:

“Lord, Lord. I gave to relief organizations. I gave to missions. I tried to make a difference in the world for you.” And the Lord will answer, “But how were your relationships with family, those you worked with daily, and with others who are part of my family, the church?”

In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus explains that the principles of shalom, that is relational wholeness and peace, are timeless. He quotes selections from the Torah and refers to long-held Jewish traditions around the Law and explains how there are essential principles that carry into the new kingdom of heaven.

Let us be vigilant about tending to our close-in relational needs with as much vigor, care, and generosity as we are about caring for global needs.