Sunday, May 29, 2022

Sermon: Thoughts and Prayers


Lectionary: Year C, Easter 7
Texts: Revelation 22:12-14, 16-17, 20-21; John 17:20-26

“The moral arc of the universe bends toward justice – but only if someone helps bend it.” [1] – Stacey M. Floyd-Thomas

This past week was the kind of week that causes even the most faithful Christian to pause and wonder, even if only in their minds, if God exists, and if God does, does God care about us?

The week opened with a report in which it was confirmed that the largest Christian denomination in the United States[2] has for decades dismissed and covered up child sexual abuse, sexual assault, and rape within not only the churches in its denomination, but among several of its past and present denominational leaders.[3] An article headline at The Atlantic read, “No Atheist Has Done This Much Damage to the Christian Faith.”[4] In a paragraph midway thorough the article, Peter Wehner, the columnist wrote,

“It’s nearly impossible to overstate how much damage these new revelations—these necessary and long-overdue revelations—are doing to the Christian witness. No atheist, no secularists or materialists, could inflict nearly as much damage to the Christian faith as these leaders within the Christian Church have done.”

This is yet another in a repeated pattern among too many churches and denominations. Institutions and their leaders seem to always prioritize their own survival and longevity over caring for the people. Those who dare accuse them are dismissed, shamed, denounced, and called liars, furthering the abuse that the victims have suffered. I’ve personally seen this in churches and church schools I’ve been a part of in my past.

Before the ink was dry on this and many other articles and commentaries that had been written on this topic, they were pushed off the pages by a massacre in Uvalde, Texas where 19 children and 2 teachers were killed by a gunman.

In its aftermath plenty of “thoughts and prayers” were offered to the victims, their families, and the community. Yet if the past is any indication of the present, many offering such “thoughts and prayers” will do nothing towards implementing measures that could reduce the occurrence of these horrific killings that seem to be so regularly occurring that only a few rise to national consciousness.

Here are just a few gun violence tragedies that took place in just the past four to five weeks:[5]

  • May 24: Uvalde, Texas – 19 children and two teachers killed at an elementary school
  • May 14: Buffalo – 10 people killed and 3 wounded in a supermarket
  • May 15: Laguna Woods, California – 1 person killed and 4 critically wounded at Irvine Taiwanese Presbyterian Church
  • May 15: Houston – 2 killed and 3 critically wounded at an open-air flea market
  • May 13: Milwaukee – 16 wounded in downtown Milwaukee
  • April 27: Biloxi, Miss. – 4 killed at a motel and another killed during a connected carjacking

If this were truly a “Christian nation”, as some Christians (erroneously) claim, would we be seeing any of this? Do the value claims of so-called pro-life Christians extend to children in schools and churches? While emphasizing liberty and freedom, how come the emphasis seems mostly to be on that which is associated with power and violence, rather than securing liberty and freedom through safety and care of the young, the weak, the vulnerable, and the marginalized?

I am angry. But I also feel helpless. And even hopeless. The church and Christians have failed and continue to fail so many times, that during times like this week, I even question the value of the church and the faith on which it supposedly rests. I’ve never seen so many pastors and Christian leaders drop the f-bomb and other 4-letter words this week. We are exhausted. We are numb. It feels like all the visible powers are stacked against justice, goodness, care, compassion, and love.

Speaking of swear words and such profanity, it should be noted that their use is not inherently a violation of the third commandment (“don’t take God’s name in vain”), although during my childhood and youth I got the idea that it was. I supposed it was related to some swear phrases using “god” but somehow the third commandment was broadened to include any profanity.

But the third commandment and its violation does have relevance to the present issue. Both Jewish and Christian sources offer us examples of what violations of the third commandment look like.

In Judaism, reciting a blessing from God and then failing to follow through may be considered a transgression of the third commandment. The most common example given is offering a blessing over food but then not partaking of it.[6]

The Epistle of James includes several examples in chapter 2 where a person claims the faith of Christ yet their actions show that their use of the name of Christ is in vain:

My brothers and sisters, do not claim the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ of glory while showing partiality. For if a person with gold rings and in fine clothes comes into your assembly, and if a poor person in dirty clothes also comes in, and if you take notice of the one wearing the fine clothes and say, “Have a seat here in a good place, please,” while to the one who is poor you say, “Stand there,” or, “Sit by my footstool,” have you not made distinctions among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts…? But you have dishonored the poor person…

15 If a brother or sister is naked and lacks daily food 16 and one of you says to them, “Go in peace; keep warm and eat your fill,” and yet you do not supply their bodily needs, what is the good of that? (James 2:1-4, 6a, 15-16)

Jesus himself taught that there would be those who use his name in vain:

21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven. 22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ 23 Then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; go away from me, you who behave lawlessly.’ (Matthew 7:21-23)

To transgress the third commandment then, has little or nothing to do with profanity but about: 1) offering a prayer or petition to God without corresponding action that demonstrates that the person praying is doing their part to fulfill the prayer or petition; and 2) claiming to be a follower of Jesus while taking actions that are incongruent to his life and teachings.

“Thoughts and prayers” that are offered for victims of abuse and victims of violence – for the most part I take them to be well-intentioned. Some may be just platitudes, but I imagine most are sincere expressions. But without corresponding action to follow through, they become meaningless words at best, and at worst, hypocrisy and even sin.

Does this mean we shouldn’t pray for victims, their families, communities, and the nation? If prayer is offered as a performative act or to quiet guilty consciences, perhaps it would be better to not pray at all. But there is a purpose for prayer, and our gospel reading from John offers a way forward.

In Jesus’ prayer recorded in John chapter 17, he prays that God will glorify him just as he glorified God during his years of ministry among the people. Jesus then prays for his disciples to be unified and be one. Jesus has given his disciples God’s word and has sent them into the world. But the world hates the disciples just as the world hates Jesus, because of the word and truth that they now proclaim. The glory that God has given Jesus, Jesus gives to his disciples and all who come to faith because of the word of God proclaimed by the disciples. And it is this glory that is the foundation of unity.

We usually associate power and might with ‘glory’, and we conjure images of Christ as a conquering king to destroy evil and establish a new kingdom of righteousness. And in other writings found in the New Testament, that may sometimes be the case.

But not in the gospel of John. For the gospel writer, the glory of Jesus is the cross and his crucifixion. It is not the kind of might or power that the world expects. Jesus’ glory is intimately related to sacrificial love. And by extension, through Jesus’ prayer, the glory of Christians is not about how powerful and influential we can be in the world, but how much sacrificial love we can have for the world.

What did sacrificial love look like in Jesus’ life? Jesus respected women. He paid attention to children. He cared for grieving widows. He took notice of the poor. He did not ignore or dismiss people with disabilities and disease. He fully accepted those of differing nationalities and race. On the other hand, he was critical of those who showed favoritism and those who marginalized, oppressed, and abused groups that were considered “less.” He was not afraid to publicly shame those who thought they were honorable and defend and lift those who society saw was dishonorable.

By violating cultural expectations and norms, by challenging the status quo, Jesus’ actions threatened the gatekeepers of power. In their honor-based society, the very basis of their position and security was challenged by Jesus. Jesus dared to expose the rot in the system and of those who supported the status quo. For them to retain their honor, Jesus would have to go. If he would not go quietly away, he would have to forcibly be removed. And that led to Jesus’ crucifixion – a death so shameful, his entire movement would be destroyed – or so they thought.

Yet it was this dishonor and shame that was the ultimate demonstration of the extent and depth of God and Jesus’ love for all people and all creation. Jesus does what he must do to play his part in answering his own prayer. The readers of Jesus’ prayer in John 17 must look to Jesus’ example to see what it means to share in his glory and be one with one another. Jesus’ prayer is not calling on God to act and then simply waiting for something to happen. Jesus’ prayer is a call to action for himself and for all of his disciples from his very first ones to all that would follow in turn.

Prayer always includes a call to action. Even the Lord’s Prayer, recited weekly, is a call to action for those who pray it. How can we help hallow God’s name? How can we bring the kingdom to earth today? How can we carry out God’s will today? How can we provide for one another’s daily needs? For what do we need to ask forgiveness from someone? How can we remain strong in the face of temptation to succumb to evil?

Do our actions even matter anymore? Hopelessness and nihilism are common refrains during the last several days.[7] Evil and violence keep repeating, and nothing changes. Attempts to make any change are blocked at every turn, or so it seems. The last thing the gatekeepers of power want is change. They benefit from things the way there are. They do not want change.[8]

Yet we are told and know that Jesus will bring about a restoration of righteousness and justice. Our reading from Revelation is one of those texts.

12 “See, I am coming soon; my reward is with me, to repay according to everyone’s work. 13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.”

14 Blessed are those who wash their robes, so that they will have the right to the tree of life and may enter the city by the gates. (Rev. 22:12-14)

The lection omitted verse 15, but it too, can be a light of hope.

15 Outside are the dogs and sorcerers and sexually immoral and murderers and idolaters and everyone who loves and practices falsehood. (Rev. 22:15)

One way of interpreting this is to see this as all in the future. We will simply have to wait patiently through the present sufferings until Jesus returns to restore everything. But I discussed in last Sunday’s sermon how the New Jerusalem and the new age was already being inaugurated and coming into the present. Today’s text is a continuation of that. Jesus is already coming and the new age is something that we have been tasked to help bring about.

The text calls Christians to action. We are to wash our robes. A commentary on this text observes,

“It is an odd directive. It points us away from sky gazing and orients us toward the everyday work of the faithful, in ways that can be interpreted both practically and metaphorically. Doing laundry is not glamorous or exciting. It can be mundane and tedious labor. Yet it is necessary…

The instructions for those who are waiting are to concentrate on the tasks at hand and to be about the work of cleansing a world made unclean.”[9]

When Jesus prayed for his disciples to share in his glory, he meant for them to do exactly the type of work that he had done. He cared for and loved those whom society ignored and oppressed. In doing so he exposed the rot and evil that was part of the system of power and culture. He exposed the hypocrisy of those who maintained the system and who benefited from it. His direct disciples continued his work, and every subsequent generation of disciples is also called upon to continue this work of exposing the rot of power-based structures and in its place seek to bring about a system based on mutual and self-sacrificing love. Power always separates and divides the haves from the have-nots. Love and sacrifice is the only path to unity, the oneness that Jesus prayed for his disciples to have.

We, as Jesus’ disciples in the 21st century, have been given the same task. Yes, pray and think. But we must also act. We must continue to launder the dirt, the filth, the rot that continues in the world. We must have the courage to be hated for exposing systems and structures that harm and divide. We must fight against the inertia of maintaining the status quo.

We must actively work against violence and work for peace. We must actively confront abusers and empower victims and survivors. We must prioritize people over systems, unjust laws, and unjust applications of laws.[10] We must have the courage to be hated for our stand against injustice, abuse, and violence.

“Thoughts and prayers” are only worthwhile if they are transformed into action to change the world for the better. “Thoughts and prayers” must lead to “laundry day”.

It can be difficult so see the kingdom of God, the New Jerusalem, the glorified Church within and among us. I pray that we will be given the eyes of faith to see reality beyond this physical reality, to see that God is even now working with and through us. And may we be given hope that can overcome the hopelessness that can so easily suffocate us and keep us from action.

The message of Easter is that Christ has overcome death, the grave, and hopelessness. Jesus’ resurrection is the vindication that sacrifice and love will overcome evil and hate. But only if we ourselves are willing to die to the ethics of the world. We must be resurrected into the new life of love and sacrifice found in Christ. May our hope remain strong in Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior.



[1] The Altars Where We Worship (trippfuller.com) (https://trippfuller.com/2022/05/20/the-altars-where-we-worship/)

[2] Largest Christian Denominations in America: The Top 100 – Christianity FAQ (https://christianityfaq.com/largest-christian-denominations-america/)

[3] Guidepost Solutions’ Report of the Independent Investigation — Task Force Updates (sataskforce.net) (https://www.sataskforce.net/updates/guidepost-solutions-report-of-the-independent-investigation)

[4] The Southern Baptist Convention's Double Trauma - The Atlantic (https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/05/southern-baptist-convention-abuse-report/630173/)

[5] Mass Shootings in 2022: A Partial List - The New York Times (nytimes.com) (https://www.nytimes.com/article/mass-shootings-2022.html)

[6] Berachos, Guides - Berachos - Beracha Levatala - Din - Ask the Rabbi (dinonline.org) (https://dinonline.org/2011/03/01/berachos-beracha-levatala/)

[7] A Culture That Kills Its Children Has No Future - The Atlantic (https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/05/uvalde-texas-robb-elementary-school-culture-death/638435/)

[8] Straight White American Jesus, podcast episode: May 27, Weekly Roundup – Guns Over People (GOP). (https://straightwhiteamericanjesus.com/series/straight-white-american-jesus/). This episode has excellent observations and commentary by a couple of scholars who study the intersection of religion and culture on both the Uvalde massacre and the SBC abuse report.

[9] Feasting on the Word: Year C, Volume 2, Easter 7, Revelation, Pastoral Perspective (Kindle version).

[10] Here I am thinking about different kinds of ethical frameworks: deontological vs. teleological and virtue ethics.

Sunday, May 22, 2022

Sermon: New Jerusalem, Here and Now

Lectionary Year C, Easter 6
Text: Revelation 21:(8-9), 10, 22-27; 22:1-5

On Interpretations and Methods of Interpretation

The last few pages of the Bible, the last couple chapters of Revelation, is in most Christian circles interpreted as what “heaven” or our eternal home away from this present world is going to be like. I don’t think that is an entirely wrong interpretation. It’s one that I grew up with and held to for at least three decades of my life. But I do think it is an interpretation that is based on modern ways of reading and interpreting literature; that is, we assume that something that appears at the end, particularly when all the words and language appear to point to a grand conclusion, therefore, must be chronologically and be spatially found at the very end of history.

We are living through times of increasing dysfunction and uncertainty, and there might be a certain amount of comfort that is found by looking to Revelation as an oracle about a future restoration of good order. When we see the violence and atrocities that are being committed by humans against humans, when our own safety and security are less certain than they were than just a few years ago, the words that tell us nothing evil will enter the restored city certainly are inviting. And looking to the words of Revelation for hope is one valid way of reading them.

But are we, the church, to merely suffer and wait through the present troubles until the words of Revelation find their fulfillment at some future time?

Intended Audience

The book of Revelation was not written to 19th, 20th, and 21st century Christians. It was written to seven churches in ancient Asia Minor (in the region of present-day Turkey). They were words with immediate applicability to these churches. The writing took place in the context of a brutal empire, at best agnostic and at worst hostile to the Christian faith, and where the Jewish Temple had been destroyed by that same empire some two to three decades prior to the writing and the Jews had been scattered. Christianity was not yet completely separate from Judaism, although the rift was widening and in many places followers of Christ were no longer welcome in synagogues.

The words, the themes, and the imagery found in Revelation are steeped in the Hebrew scriptures: the Prophets certainly, but also the Torah and the Writings. It does violence to Revelation when it is interpreted apart from the allusions the writer makes back to his scripture. Unfortunately, many modern interpretations of Revelation do just that. They make the a priori assumption that it contains prophecies about the modern world and attempt to fit the words to modern-day events and persons.

One other critical piece of information necessary to interpret Revelation is the knowledge that the term “time of the end” or “age to come” is not pointing to a long distant future, but a new age that was inaugurated and ushered in through the death and resurrection of Jesus. Whenever we see a New Testament writer referring to end times, we need to understand that they assumed that they were already starting to live in it. That said, they also understood that the prior age was still ongoing alongside, and that the complete fulfillment of the promise of the age to come was yet to be in the future.

This rather long preamble I think is necessary because, in a nutshell, what we read from Revelation today, the original recipients would have understood to already be taking place among them.

The Identity of the New Jerusalem

The lectionary reading starts at chapter 21, verse 10, but if we just back up one verse we get a fuller context: “Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls full of the seven last plagues came and said to me, ‘Come, I will show you the bride, the wife of the Lamb.’” Then continuing, “And in the spirit he carried me away to a great, high mountain and showed me the holy city Jerusalem coming down out of heaven from God.”

John is told he will be shown the bride and the wife of the Lamb. From other texts in the New Testament, it is understood that the bride metaphor represents the church. John expects to see the church, but instead he sees the New Jerusalem. Many biblical scholars today agree that the New Jerusalem is in fact a symbolic representation of the church. Several of the letters to the churches at the beginning of Revelation contain references to imagery found in the description of the New Jerusalem. For example,

Church at Ephesus

Those who conquer will be given permission to eat from the tree of life (2:7; c.f. 22:2)

Church at Sardis

Those who conquer will have their names in the book of life (3:5; c.f., 21:27)

Church at Philadelphia

Those who conquer will have the name of God and the name of the New Jerusalem written on them (3:12; c.f., 22:4)

Church at Laodicea

Those who conquer will join God on the throne and reign with God (3:21; c.f., 22:3, 5)

I think this reinforces the interpretation that the New Jerusalem is the church.

Characteristics of the New Jerusalem 

What then are some of the features and characteristics that describe the New Jerusalem?

No Temple

First, there is no temple. But then the text immediately goes to state that God and the Lamb is the temple. In any ancient civilization, the temple was the religious, civic, political, and social center. But in the New Jerusalem, there is no separate structure that the people “go” to. Rather, the very presence of God is the temple, and God’s presence permeates the entire city. When this thought is carried through to the interpretation that the New Jerusalem is the church, it means that there are no special locations or objects that are more sacred than others. Everything about the church is included in God’s sphere. In the wilderness sanctuary and the subsequent Israelite temple and the Second temple at Jesus’ time, there were designated levels of holiness and rings of scaredness as one went from the outside to the center, from the courtyard to the Most Holy place, which was seen as the throne room of God. These distinctions no longer exist in the church. Everyone is on equal footing, whatever gender, whatever nationality, whatever socio-economic status – all have direct access to God.

Always Day

The next characteristic of the New Jerusalem is that it is always day, never night, and no illumination is needed because God and the Lamb are its light. Now, this might be literally the case, but I do see it more in symbolic terms, especially when interpreting this city as the church. Both the sun and moon which give light during the day and night, are created objects. But when the Creator is there in person, all other illuminations fade away. What I think this suggests is that whereas in prior ages, prophets and priests mediated God for the people, and God was understood in terms of those messages, in the unfolding age, the church should be seeing and understanding God in the revelation of Jesus Christ, which not coincidentally is the first line of the book of Revelation.

The next characteristic of this city is that the “nations will walk by its light and the kings of the earth will bring glory to it,” and “people will bring into it the glory and the honor of the nations.” What this suggests to me is that the city, and therefore, the church, is broadly inclusive.

The Gates of the City

The text also tells us that the gates of the city will never be shut by day, and then adds an observation that there is no more night. Therefore, the city’s gates will never be shut, ever. Most traditional interpretations take this part of the description of the New Jerusalem and interpret in terms of security: that in this future city, there will be no more reason to fear. Again, I think that is a valid interpretation. But in this discussion, where we are interpreting the city as the church, I think there are additional possibilities for understanding the open gates.

The gates are open to let those who are coming from the outside into the city. And we just heard that the nations and their kings, walking by the light of the Lamb, are coming to the city. What this suggests is threefold. First, that the light from the church shines so brightly that the world around will want to come inside. Second, that the church is a welcoming place for everyone. The nations may have very different customs and practices, and those who enter are different in nationality and race. Yet they have one thing in common with those that are already inside: they are walking by the light of the Lamb. And the gates are open to them. They are welcome. The third point is that their entering in adds to the glory of the church. The light that shines in the city grows brighter as these different cultures, nations, practices, traditions, and experiences add to the church.

What is Not in the City

Going on… The next characteristic of the city is described in the negative, describing what is not present. “But nothing unclean will enter it, nor anyone who practices abomination or falsehood… Nothing accursed will be found there any more.”

A Brief History of Sacred Spaces

To understand why this is so important, we must look back at the history of sacred spaces in the Bible. The first sacred space was the Garden of Eden, but it was invaded by a liar and caused the fall of humankind. The wilderness tabernacle was the next defined sacred space, but almost immediately after the final curtain was hung, Nadab and Abihu brought in unauthorized fire into the sanctuary and promptly died as a result. The word unauthorized can also be translated “strange” and has the meaning of “not holy”. Solomon’s Temple was profaned numerous times during its history. And the Second Temple was first defiled by Antiochus IV Epiphanes when he erected an altar to Zeus. The cleansing of the Temple by Jesus demonstrates that he believed that there were elements of uncleanness and defilement ongoing in the Temple during his time.

We tend to think of clean and unclean and defilement as limited to the religious sphere, but in ancient conception there was no clear distinction among religious, societal, and political spheres. Uncleanness was considered a pollution to all of life, if left unchecked. It could spread to the entire nation and cut them off from God. The purification rituals were provided to offer ways of correcting this potential danger.

Every sacred space recorded in Hebrew and Jewish history had been defiled. History does not bode well for sacred spaces. But the promise is that when the New Jerusalem manifests in its final glory, nothing will be allowed into it that causes defilement. No seed of impurity will be allowed in again. No contagious contamination will be allowed in to spread and destroy this final sacred space.

Uncleanness and Contamination in Revelation

What are some of these pollutants that is being referred to? Revelation 21:8 offers a possible clarification, “But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the polluted, the murderers, the fornicators, the sorcerers, the idolaters, and all liars, their place will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death.”

When we hear this, we might immediately think of these as individual sins committed by individuals. But we should recall the context of the writing of Revelation: that it was written to churches after the destruction of Jerusalem, to Christians who at times were persecuted by the Roman Empire. Revelation was written to encourage resistance against the Empire and to not give up.

Aside from isolated incidents of persecution against Christians, at that time there was no systematic persecution against them nor was there any specific law forbidding Christianity. Only when Christians were accused by someone for violating the customs and laws of the Empire did religious allegiance become an issue. And for much of this part of history, the test was merely to denounce Jesus Christ. It was easy to acquiesce to the Empire, remain quiet, and be fairly safe and secure. I read the above chapter 21:8 as a polemic against this kind of “getting by” kind of Christianity. Revelation is demanding that Christians take a bold stand against the Empire and what it stands for.

Contagious Contamination in the 21st Century Church

The uncleanness, the abomination, and the lies that Revelation refers to, I believe, is the kind of Christianity that is acceptable to the powers of the world, with the desire to be in league with these powers, and the timidity and cowardice and fear that keeps good Christians silent in the face of clear and obvious immorality and injustice. This kind of pollution is contagious, and I do believe it has contaminated a great swath of modern-day Christianity. The warnings and challenges found in Revelation are just as relevant today as it was during the Roman Empire.

The Source of Life


The kind of church that does not compromise with the powers of the world, which does not seek worldly power, and which is vocal in challenging the injustices of the powerful has something to offer: Life. Life is at the center of the New Jerusalem. Life is pictured as a river flowing from the center of the city and the Tree of Life straddling this river. The source of Life is the God and the Lamb, who are on their throne.

The only genuine power and authority is already in the church. The source of truth and life is among the church. Yet the church is frequently all too willing to pursue temporal power and privilege; to embrace tacitly, and sometimes explicitly, lies to further its temporal power; to claim support for life yet demonstrate that it is a claim in name only.

We are living in an age of renewed empire. Power is being consolidated into the hands of a few. We see the increasing sufferings of more and more populations, not just here in America but throughout the world. American Christianity is still very much a privileged segment of society. Many of us realize there is much wrong in our society, even here locally. Yet we would rather remain the silent majority. To be too loud might bring negative attention, perhaps even opposition.

What does living faithfully in Christ look like? Would we speak and behave differently if our trust was completely in the faithfulness of Christ to carry us through whatever we go through? What does it look like for the church, and this church, to be a bright shining light to the world? Do we experience the River of Life and the Tree of Life in our midst? Is it freely available to anyone who is willing to partake of it?

A small group of Christ’s followers on Easter morning changed the world. That same power and authority is still with us. We may be small, but we can be bold in proclaiming and living the life that is found in Christ. We can offer to this community a foretaste, today, of the New Jerusalem promised in its final glory.